How bad is your manager, and...
How Mad Is Your Employer?
By
October 28, 2001
Having read through most of the stories on this site, you might think that your own
employer is pretty sane in comparison.
|
"But that's nothing like my company..."
|
|
It is very comforting to sit back on your
swivel chair and chuckle about how unfortunate some of those poor bastards working for all
those cowboy companies must be. "But not here," you may think. "Thank God [or personal
deity] there's nothing like that where I work!"
Think again - it's human nature to be mad, as in 'not quite in tune with reality'. And
beneath the surface of your perfect employer, madness dwells. If you think it's not
there, it's simply because you haven't spotted it yet. If you're still convinced, then
a good long retrospective gaze might be in order - you never know, you might even have become a cog in the big
ferris wheel of madness, and you wouldn't know it because you're mad. Just like them!
Of course if you've seen crazy things going on, and recognised them as being crazy, and if you have despaired over such things, then that's okay. Read on, you're one
of us after all...
|
"It's okay, he's always done it that way"
|
|
See, everyone has wrong opinions about something; everyone has misguided beliefs,
whether about something trivial or something more
profound like "coding without a proper design is a good thing". That's fair enough: life is
a complex beast, and you can't be expected to be 100% correct and robot-like about
everything. But it's when people make
decisions based on wrongness, or persistently behave in the wrong way, mistakenly
believing that they are right, that they must be at least a little bit mad. Worse
still is when someone either suspects or knows full well that they are wrong, yet
persists in doing that wrong thing regardless. Often this can be put down to some apparently rational piece of reasoning, such as "it's a political thing", or "he's always done it that way". But it's still mad.
Anyway that's all very theoretical: let me give you an example.
A project manager has been
asked to resource a project based on a hastily produced project plan. The plan was
produced quickly so that the company would have something "concrete" to show the
customer in the course of their tender for a new project. Of course, everyone in the
company knows full well that the plan is absolute rubbish: it's a customer-facing
propaganda document, i.e. complete, unsubstantiated lies.
"Produce on-line fulfillment
system: 20 days". wtf?? Well, never mind, it fulfilled its purpose: the customer was
duly impressed, and is going with your company. They are placing their trust, and their
millions of dollars, in your ability to navigate a highly complex project and produce
something that they can use, within the time promised.
|
"The problem that higher management don't want to notice"
|
|
But there's a problem, and it's an insidious one that higher management don't seem to
want to notice: the live project is going ahead with that bullshit project plan. The
one that has no meaning. The entire project MUST be completed in six months, yet no-one
knows exactly what will be in the project yet. And the one, totally artificial reason
for the six-month deadline is simply that that's what the customer was promised by your
eager-beaver sales team.
To make matters worse, the plan is full of high-level guff that means everything and
nothing. The project manager knows that the plan is rubbish, yet
goes along with it - makes crucial decisions based on this plan, e.g. how many staff to
allocate, whether or not to bring in contractors, and so on. Worse still, the project
is COSTED based on this plan and the customer is given an up-front quote. Never mind that
the final project will really take over 2 years to complete, and will cost five times as
much.
By the time the project manager realises this, it is way too late. The customer is
disgusted, higher management use the project manager as a scapegoat to save their own
hides (but it needn't matter because the company is going under anyway).
Of course that situation could have been avoided if the manager had simply faced up to
what he already knew: if they are going to lie to the customer, they should at least be
honest with themselves.
|
"Better still, just tell the customer the truth from the start"
|
|
Put another way, if they really must have a customer-facing plan that
is all sweetness and roses, they must also have an internal plan that tells it like it really
is. Better still, just tell the customer the goddamned truth. If it means losing the contract
to a less scrupulous company, then so be it. At least you can watch that company make an
absolute arse of itself and make a horrific loss in the process. Phew, that was a close one -
that was almost us, guys!
How many times has your manager proceeded on false assumptions? Whether trivial or company-changing, it is important to recognise insanity when you see it. Otherwise, bad management
will be going on right under your nose, and you won't even know it for what it is.
Back to Soapbox
|